Neantherthals, Denisovans, Humans, Homo-Sapiens, All the Same Species

Man, is not a descendant from any of them. They are all the same species according to new research and thousands of scientists.

Skulls of homo sapiens and “Neantherthals” are very similar, except Neantherthals had bigger brains and skulls. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/neantherthals-denisovans-homo-sapiens-all-same-fred-echeverria/

Denisovan and Neantherthals people—considered “archaic humans” by most anthropologists. However, they are simply homo-sapies, just like any human today

The rarely acknowledged fact is that they (the Denisovans) are known only on the basis of a single and sole finger bone and a couple of teeth from a Siberian cave, nothing else.

That is why, thousands of scientists are in agreement with the reality that, the only ape-men are ape fossils that have been, for years, mislabeled as human-related and human fossils misidentified as apes. In other words there are no ape-men-human transitional fossils. They say, that idea is a hoax.

In fact, studies and emerging genetic data on the so called ancestors of man, the Neanderthals and now Denisovans is increasingly demonstrating that they were both of the homo sapiens species, in other words they all belonged to the humans race.

Evolutionists interested in influencing the public with their “evolutionary” idea will present two totally different pictures (artists conception) of what Neantherthals and Denisovans looked like.

For example, here is one version of what one “evolutionist” thinks that Neanderthals looked like.

Image courtesy of http://www.amendez.com/NAES/Poster_Material_files/NASP%20EM%20Neanderthal%20Man%20Misinterperted-text%20and%20photo.pdf

While a more modern-day version and better research show they looked like this:

Thinkific

 

In other words, this is a fully formed human, like any other today.

Image courtesy of https://www.livescience.com/28036-neanderthals-facts-about-our-extinct-human-relatives.html. Credit: Mauro Cutrona

A scientist who holds a Ph.D in human biology stated the following: “Give him a shave, haircut, and button-down shirt and this “Neantherthal” would blend right into a city crowd” like any other person (Biddle, Bisbee, & Bergman, 2016, pp 34).

Surprisingly, skulls of Homo Sapiens and “Neantherthals” are the same, except Neantherthals had bigger brains and skulls.

Image courtesy of Wikipedia.org

The carefully redacted “news” and description of “new” group of humans, would make the reader believe that there is indeed a separate species between modern-day humans and Neanderthals and Denisovans. The fact is that they are all the same.

“Biologist Ernst Mayr proposed in 1942 that a species is a population of organisms that can all interbreed with each other, and which either cannot or do not interbreed with anything else. This idea became known as the Biological Species Concept, and evidently many of us learn it as fact.” It is still a fact, even though some evolution minded writers want to convince you otherwise.

Another scientist, Jeremy Taylor,   in the publication ” Not a Chimp : The Hunt to Find the Genes that Make Us Human”  stated there is a huge difference between chimps and humans. In his book, “Taylor convincingly debunks the assertion that our two species are nearly identical genetically. He sketches the picture now emerging from cutting-edge research in genetics, animal behavior, and other fields to show that the so-called 1.6% difference is effectively much larger, leading to a profound divergence between the two species.”

Why are Mules Sterile ?

” Horses have 64 chromosomes and donkeys 62, so when the two breed their mule offspring ends up with 63. Because this is an odd number, it’s impossible for them to divide evenly into two.”

Another publication also stated that “Donkeys have 62 chromosomes, horses have 64, and zebras have 44”.  https://www.icr.org/article/donkey-gives-birth-zedonk

Additionally, “The Przewalski’s horse–considered to be most similar to the ancient population that gave rise to all of modern horse kind–has 66 chromosomes, while another, called Hartman’s mountain zebra, has only 32.”

It is obvious then, that because of the differing chromosome numbers, it might be contended that these horse-like varieties were created separately. Nevertheless, they are considered of the same species.

“The most direct evidence comes from the fact that they can interbreed. This marks them as belonging to one kind. Modern and recent studies indicates that each life form was designed to reproduce within a distinct kind.”

Thus, it has been observed that many of–if not most–instances of biological change are known to occur rapidly, in fact, often within one generation.

For example, researchers in France were shocked to find that separate species of bees, which normally pollinate their own particular species of orchid, happened to cross-pollinate other two orchids.
This gave yield to a new orchid that attracted yet another or a third species of bees.

What about the Galapagos Islands, where researchers never expected to find a hybrid iguana consisting of land and marine iguanas. Nevertheless, these animals also appeared suddenly within one single generation, not within millions of years.

The fact of the matter is that Chromosomes can change rather rapidly, but they stay within the same Kind. All of this points to the fact that all creatures are designed with the ability to undergo rapid changes. This DNA and chromosomes designed mandate is there in order to fulfill a purpose–to be fruitful and multiply and fill the world’s rapidly changing environmental diversity.

This last process is called “adaptation” or “microevolution”, where changes do occur within any species, however, any of those changes are totally reversible and they never end up in a new kind or species of organism. https://sites.google.com/site/dnageneticsresearch/did-darwin-s-finches-prove-evolution

Zedonks are rare, but they offer a glimpse into the variety and of the beauty of all life.

Now regarding the Denisovan “Findings”

What can you tell from a pinky and a molar ?

For example a report said: “Genetic data gathered from a tooth and a portion of a pinky bone found in a Siberia’s Denisova cave have confirmed the existence of a “new” group of humans related to Neanderthals and “modern” humans (though their genes are more similar to Neanderthals’). “

Nevertheless, the fact is that, Neanderthals have a larger skull and larger brains of about 200 cc more than us today (Biddle, Bisbee, & Bergman, 2016, pp 32).

If anything, there has been a “devolution” as our brains have gotten smaller, according to Bergman.

Another report said, “but the most interesting twist (from the evolutionary perspective) is that modern humans from New Guinea have Denisovan DNA.” Once again showing that both modern-day homo sapiens or humans are simply the same species as Denisovans.

While an evolutionary perspective interprets this as meaning that Guineans’ ancestors “interbred” with Denisovans, a true scientific perspective interprets this as simply meaning that the descendants of one of the people groups, a few thousand years ago, eventually settled in what is now New Guinea.

“That is, rather than thinking of Denisovans—or even of Neanderthals—as a separate group of “less-than-humans,” we should merely think of them as a collection of our ancestors with certain genes…as the genes from our other ancestors.”

This may have been because those humans grew more isolated from other humans and, as a result, their genetic diversity and fitness declined. But they were both just as (or even more intelligent than) modern humans. (As an aside, scientists recently learned that Neanderthals cooked and ate vegetables—but true scientists are not surprised.)

“Writing for BBC News, Clive Finlayson, director of the Gibraltar Museum, emphasizes that both Denisovans and Neanderthals belonged to our species, Homo sapiens. “

The report concludes saying that: “Indeed, given the original definition of species as referring to organisms that could interbreed successfully, treating them as separate species doesn’t make sense”.

 

Another Artist’s conception of Neantherthals.

Image courtesy of Wikipedia.org

Give this man a shave or not, he looks like one of us. Not a different species. Please remember that the sclera of the eyes do not fossilize, thus, these conceptions are all imagination, after all.

 

Neantherthals, did not look like this !

They were fully formed humans.

Image courtesy of Wikipedia.org

 

Sources and References:

Biddle, D., A. Ph. ., Bisbee, D., A., & Bergman, J., Ph. . (2016). Debunking Human Evolution Taught in Our Public Schools. Gemesis Apologetics, Inc.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/neantherthals-denisovans-homo-sapiens-all-same-fred-echeverria/

https://answersingenesis.org/human-evolution/hominids/meet-the-denisovans/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12071424

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sapiens_neanderthal_comparison.jpg

https://answersingenesis.org/genetics/human-genome/modern-east-asians-denisovans-share-genes/

https://www.livescience.com/28036-neanderthals-facts-about-our-extinct-human-relatives.html

https://avemariahomeschooling.blogspot.com/p/scientists-today-who-accept-biblical.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_sapiens#Anatomical_modernity

https://mauihomeschool.blogspot.com/p/scientists-today-who-accept-biblical.html

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelmarshalleurope/2018/08/28/a-long-busted-myth-its-not-true-that-animals-belonging-to-different-species-can-never-interbreed/#1827bb243e65

https://answersingenesis.org/genetics/dna-similarities/genome-wide-dna-alignment-similarity-identity-for-40000-chimpanzees/

http://www.amendez.com/NAES/Poster_Material_files/NASP%20EM%20Neanderthal%20Man%20Misinterperted-text%20and%20photo.pdf